On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 02:36:28PM +0530, Rahul wrote: > "The article revealed that many distributions' maintainers were > erroneously assuming that they did not need to provide source > repositories for packages they did not modify, so long as the original > upstream distribution did provide the source code. This responsibility > is by no means new, but seems to have been widely overlooked. David I'm kind of shocked that anyone with the skills to maintain a derivative distribution wasn't aware of the basics of the GPL. > Needless to say, a better working arrangement with derivative > distributions is pretty important for Fedora. We have a number of Fedora > derivatives out there that could be doing interesting modifications that > we need to look at. And we need to do a better job feeding back to Fedora. There's just so little time! -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
