Marc Wiriadisastra wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 10:16 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le dimanche 09 juillet 2006 à 11:35 +0530, Tejas Dinkar a écrit :
My question is, should/do we have a page on the wiki dedicated to stuff
like this?
IMHO as long as the licensing is compatible, it should all end in a
fedora-extras package
Disagree. What if I also want *my* wallpapers as a package in Extras?
You merely have to provide a package for review according to the
packaging guidelines, respond to comments and fix up issues and continue
maintaining them.
What if a ton of other people want the same? Where it stops?
It stops when people lose interest or when the images are questionable.
I can't see why anyone would package tons of images in Fedora Extras. We
will get to solve it when we reach that point.
I think a package in Extras should include a limited number of
*selected* wallpapers with the rest hosted in an online gallery, which
gallery should be part of Fedora Art, with a very low barrier to entry
for new contributors.
What makes the cut? I'm not trying to be stupid here but having someone
dictate what kind of wallpaper is allowed or not provided, it meets the
extras requirement, should be allowed.
We already specify a limitation of not allowing content in the packaging
guidelines.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-daa717ea096fa4d9cf7b9a49b5edb36e3bda3aac
This specifically says that wallpapers are allowed. If someone packages
up a lot of wallpapers, thats their choice. If there are problems with
that, we will discuss it when it happens. Arguing about these kind of
stuff therotically is useless.
Rahul
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
