On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Dimitris Glezos wrote: > O/H Nicolas Mailhot έγραψε: > > Le dimanche 09 juillet 2006 à 11:35 +0530, Tejas Dinkar a écrit : > >> Hey, I was reading dfong's blog, and I found she has made a huge > >> collection of brilliant Fedora Wallpapers, that are liscenced under the > >> Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License > > > > ... > > > >> My question is, should/do we have a page on the wiki dedicated to stuff > >> like this? > > > > IMHO as long as the licensing is compatible, it should all end in a > > fedora-extras package > > I believe that the CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License of > Diana's work is not compatible because of the Non commercial and No > derivatives clauses. > > We could ask her to consider dual-licencing the wallpapers under the FDL > or something compatible. Heh. Licensing, content, and RPMs. A fascinating topic. :) We don't yet have a clear policy for licensing of artwork. The Fedora logo, for instance, *cannot* itself be licensed because it's a trademark that we want to protect. But what does that mean for projects that seek to reuse that artwork? Makes it very difficult. --g ------------------------------------------------------------- Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
