On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 16:21 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:09:02PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > That is no longer based on Fedora. That includes parts of Fedora, but > > adds to it, and thus cannot be claimed to be Fedora. Get the package in > > Extras (; > > What? That makes no logical sense. You're saying that something takes a > _base_ of Fedora and builds on that base by adding additional packages is > some way not _based_ on Fedora? I used the wrong term. If we're going to allow the logo to be used on anything that is 'BUILT' from Fedora binary packages (Core+Extras), then as soon as you add anything to that outside of existing Core+Extras packages then it can't use the logo. That's what I was trying to drive. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
