Re: Fedora derivatives branding discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:09:02PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> That is no longer based on Fedora.  That includes parts of Fedora, but
> adds to it, and thus cannot be claimed to be Fedora.  Get the package in
> Extras (;

What? That makes no logical sense. You're saying that something takes a
_base_ of Fedora and builds on that base by adding additional packages is
some way not _based_ on Fedora?

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux