On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 20:19 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
but its still derived from fedora isnt it? distcc is hanging idle in
bugzilla for ages :)
someone finish the review.
No, because (as Max forgot to mention) the Based on Fedora must be based
on the Binary packages, not rebuilds of the source packages. No
published Binary, can't use it.
That's a good point. People have to use the same binaries, signed by
Fedora/Red Hat if they want to be "official". We can't trust people to
not mess them up or do weird stuff if they rebuild from source.
--
Max Spevack
+ gpg key -- http://people.redhat.com/~mspevack/mspevack.asc
+ fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
