On Wednesday 29 March 2006 21:49, Max Spevack wrote: > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Clair wrote: > > On Wednesday 29 March 2006 21:30, Max Spevack wrote: > >> Is it really special treatment? Special treatment, in my mind, would be > >> putting a vendor to the top of the list because they offered us a > >> kickback. Special treatment implies "shady dealings". I don't see this > >> proposal as being special treatment at all. Karlie is voluteering to > >> offer a service that *none* of the other vendors are offering, and we > >> are acknowledging that. It's not like she is the *only* vendor who can > >> do this. Wouldn't it be wonderful if all of our vendors believed so > >> strongly in Fedora that they wanted to do the same thing? > > > > Ah, but until recently one of the vendors was also giving away free > > media. > > I did not know that. In what way did we differentiate them from the other > vendors who were not? I put 'free' under "price". Clair -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
