Re: Boston FUDCon 2006

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/23/05, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One argument is that it would be one less repo that is checked for each yum
> action (or each yum action after the cache timeout).  It would also add
> load to the master download server.

compromise that does not address the issue of "trust" but addresses
the issues of unnecessary server load and client activity. legacy off
by default through the normal release cycle and the last official
package in the normal lifespan is a new fedora-release package that
switches the legacy repo on and the updates-released and
updates-testing off?

-jef

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux