We have formed the Fedora websites team, which discusses things on fedora-websites-list[1]. Some have asked me who really owns/controls the websites. Is Marketing accountable? Documentation? How about Infrastructure? Here's how I see it, using this model: * FDP is the umbrella project that is accountable for all content and knowledge management across Fedora. We are growing as fast as we can to cover all these areas. * Marketing is accountable for our message, focus, goals, direction, attitude, etc. As such, they are often responsible for the content and design within the various formal Fedora sites[2]. * Infrastructure is responsible for maintaining the current backends of the sites, and developing new stuff from their own ideas and as responses to RFEs that are filtered to them by FDP and Marketing. Does this make sense to you all? Other thoughts? cheers - Karsten [1] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list This list is for developers, maintainers, designers, and content managers to discuss the various formal Fedora sites. [2] Formal being a better word than 'official', and the formal sites right now are fedora.redhat.com and fedoraproject.org. -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
