On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 09:18 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 10/18/05, Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Fedora Documentation > fedora-websites > > > > All bugs for all formal Fedora websites should use this component. > > Can there be a clear... enumerated listing...as to what counts as a > "formal" site in the definition of that bugzilla component? Argh! You caught me ... curses! Foiled again. I was trying to avoid the loaded term "official", so I have started calling things "formal". Consensus decisions that become "the-way-it's-done" == "formal". For us, it really can only mean sites we control the domain, hosting, etc. of. I'll see if there is a way to get that into the bugzilla description, but I The bugzilla description now[1] reads: "Problems and requests for all formal Fedora Project websites. This list is currently: fedoraproject.org and fedora.redhat.com." [1] Now is relative to when some magic-fu happens. > I guess the fedoraproject.org mainpage and wiki header/footer should > have a link back to this "formalized" bugzilla component. Yeah, that would be cool. > -jef"if only we had a servicable trademark that could be used > exclusively on formal sites to help distinguish which sites are > tracked in the central bugzilla...."spaleta Yeah, and a link to a pre-filled bugzilla request. - Karsten > -jef > > -- > Fedora-marketing-list mailing list > Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
