Karsten Wade wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 14:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
PS: I guess the title is wrong, , instead of "Linux not ready for the
desktop" it should be "GNOME not ready for the desktop" or "KDE not
ready for the desktop"
You are arguing semantics there. Large majority of end users make no
differentiation between GNOME/KDE UI and a "Linux UI"
Yes, but authors such as the one of the article discussed here need to
have some clue about that.
I am pretty sure he understand Desktop Linux interfaces to stand for
GNOME/KDE or dozens of alternative WM 's or DE's. The presentation does
apply to all of them. Clarifying that is side stepping from the actual
issues being discussed
regards
Rahul
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
