On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 14:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > > > PS: I guess the title is wrong, , instead of "Linux not ready for the > > desktop" it should be "GNOME not ready for the desktop" or "KDE not > > ready for the desktop" > > > You are arguing semantics there. Large majority of end users make no > differentiation between GNOME/KDE UI and a "Linux UI" Yes, but authors such as the one of the article discussed here need to have some clue about that. After all, arguing about the desktop with a kernel engineer is like discussing dashboard layout details with the powerplant automotive engineer. It is worth noting because both GNOME and KDE have particular ideas around usability. They are not just pulling features from their rear clefts. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
