On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> > How about we steal the logo for pup and put a little bitty hat on him?
>
> That is indeed a cute logo, it would only need a creative person to do a
> story about the relationship between the pup and the distro.
> You say to put a hat on him: so what is the final resolution, hats are
> allowed or forbidden?
A straight hat as a logo is clearly forbidden. A hat that is an element
of another logo may be acceptable. It'll certainly be easier to lobby
for.
> When defining the rules for the logo we may want or not to impose
> certain technical restrictions, like low number of colors (to not have
> something expensive to print), the image to allow a monochrome variant
> (to be possible to put in on faxes) etc.
I'll say this for everyone's benefit: the design folks at RH are perfectly
happy to spend cycles on this, and they understand these issues deeply.
So no worries there.
The one big rule, though: this logo needs to be extensible, right?
--g
_____________________ ____________________________________________
Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent. the
Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the
] [ dumb. --mcluhan
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
