On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 22:18 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 11:56 +1000, Mike MacCana wrote: > > > > The current 'rpm for queries and local/remote installs, yum for local > > and remote installs with dependencies' situation is, from a user POV, > > weird. > > yum can do local lists and local installs. Yes, as I said above, yum can do local installs. And I'm aware of the local listing capability. > quite frankly for 80% of the user case - if they're using the command > line - they can just use yum. True. But for those of us who aren't beginners, but who appreciate simplity and elegance, it's be lovely to ask what package installed a file with yum or pup. Perhaps yum or pup could also have an option to restore that file to it's factory defaults (original contents), or other useful things for us admin folks. Mike -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
