On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 13:00 -0400, Sam Hiser wrote: > On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 12:59 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > Keep in mind also that one of the principal points of differentiation > > > for distros -- substantial points -- has to do with RPM vs APT. It is a > > > difference which can carry an adoption. Each suits different people on > > > its merits and respective frictions. All's to Good. > > > > rpm vs apt? > > > > You're kidding right? I thought we had finally put this one to bed a > > while ago. > > > > okay: rpm == dpkg > > apt == yum or apt-rpm or whatever. > > > > just so we're clear. > > Of course, so careless of me, Seth. But I guess my point is that the differences between rpm and deb and yum and apt is a stone's throw in terms of functionality. So what's the big point of differentiation? -sv -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
