On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 18:11, Colin Charles wrote: > On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 10:15, Jeremy Hogan wrote: > > So we're finally giving Fedora significant prominence on redhat.com. > > www.redhat.com ? Yep. Our site design is changing, and Fedora gets it's own upper level nav. That gives a mini-home page for fedora, that positions it and sends the user to fedora.redhat.com. > Shouldn't the links be kept at the fedora.redhat.com site? And the new > URL that points there should be used, rather than keeping a few links > sitting on www.redhat.com itself ? Maybe, except I have zero direct control over fedora.redhat.com, whereas a traffic request let's me update rh.com. Maybe instead of those sorts of sites, a widget box that deep links into FAQs, Downloads, and projects like the utility links in the upper right of fedora.redhat.com. > > > What should those sites be? These would be unofficially official (whilst > > still being officially unofficial), so they should be 4 or 5 sites we're > > the most comfortable pointing folks at. > > Fedora Legacy - www.fedoralegacy.org > Fedora Unofficial FAQ - www.fedorafaq.org * > FedoraNEWS.ORG - www.fedoranews.org > FedoraForums - www.fedoraforums.org > > * - should we start taking the effort to getting the Fedora Docs project > to organise the FAQ, i.e. we consolidate it to our main site at > fedora.redhat.com ? Yeah, whatever makes us most comfortable with pointing users there. > > Also, from a usability standpoint, a newbie might go, "what's a FAQ?". > So we should try "Frequently Asked Questions" as a link on the main site > (rather than unofficial FAQ)... Yeah, the links have space for text explaining them. --jeremy
