On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 10:15, Jeremy Hogan wrote: > So we're finally giving Fedora significant prominence on redhat.com. www.redhat.com ? > The Fedora page will be a positioning paragraph much like: > > "Fedora is a Red Hat sponsored, community-developed..." blurb we usually > use, but we'll be adding a small widget of links to resources. I thought > it could link into the FAQs and Download section, but also to some of > the tertiary sites (fedoralegacy, linuxquestions.org etc). Shouldn't the links be kept at the fedora.redhat.com site? And the new URL that points there should be used, rather than keeping a few links sitting on www.redhat.com itself ? > What should those sites be? These would be unofficially official (whilst > still being officially unofficial), so they should be 4 or 5 sites we're > the most comfortable pointing folks at. Fedora Legacy - www.fedoralegacy.org Fedora Unofficial FAQ - www.fedorafaq.org * FedoraNEWS.ORG - www.fedoranews.org FedoraForums - www.fedoraforums.org * - should we start taking the effort to getting the Fedora Docs project to organise the FAQ, i.e. we consolidate it to our main site at fedora.redhat.com ? Gives us better stature, works better for the project in general, and we'll have to do it eventually (even if its a few years down the line) as newbies will want to know where to get information ASAP - remember, throughout the install, they see links to "fedora.redhat.com" (or its new equivalent) Also, from a usability standpoint, a newbie might go, "what's a FAQ?". So we should try "Frequently Asked Questions" as a link on the main site (rather than unofficial FAQ)... -- Colin Charles, byte@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.bytebot.net/ "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi
