Hans and all, I've re-opened the ticket for python-enet (previously pyenet) and made some changes, including the package name. * http://nmarques.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-enet/ If anyone can help with the review (I know Tom is a very busy man) would most welcome; python-enet requires also libenet (ENet) >= 1.3.3; as I am aware Tom has updated the dependencies already for ENet. I'm currently uploading the unknown-horizons SRPM and spec also (will take some time since it's a fat SRPM and my home connection uplink is... well.... slow... When it's over (20 mins or so) it will be here: * http://nmarques.fedorapeople.org/packages/unknown-horizons/ NM 2012/5/14 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi, > > > On 05/13/2012 08:05 PM, Nelson Marques wrote: >> >> 2012/5/13 Hans de Goede<hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> On 05/12/2012 07:15 PM, Nelson Marques wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> 2012/5/12 Hans de Goede<hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> >>>>> First of all, welcome to the Fedora Games mailinglist, and let me say >>>>> that >>>>> we would love to have Unknown Horizons in Fedora. >>>>> >>>>> You mentioned a review request for UH that you closed, which I indeed >>>>> found: >>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718430 >>>>> >>>>> That review request points to this (recently fixed) FIFE bug: >>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757352 >>>>> >>>>> But AFAIK there is no new review request for UH, did I miss it? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm going to re-open it (the one you mentioned before) once we have >>>> all the dependencies prepared, let go a bit further: >>>> >>>> 1. Tom (spot) has updated the dependencies required to update ENet >>>> (libenet), which provides the base layer for multiplayer. With ENet >>>> updated, I can continue with my review request for 'python-enet' which >>>> provides the python bindings used by UH for Multiplayer. >>>> >>>> 2. FIFE - The packaging of FIFE isn't really as I would like to be. >>>> I'm gathering soon with FIFE upstream to propose a packaging model >>>> that upstream can support and hopefully to implement it on the next >>>> release in Fedora (and openSUSE); >>>> >>> >>> Ok. >>> >>> >>>> 3. Guichan - a dependency to build FIFE; This probably the only >>>> blocker as we need to submit a patch which was previously submited to >>>> upstream, but no action was taken on it and upstream from guichan >>>> seems to be masturbating themselves with UTF-8 implementation over the >>>> last 2 years but no real release was made. I'm going to propose this >>>> patch to Fedora guichan, which I don't mind also to co-maintain. If >>>> guichan doesn't fix this, we're (UH upstream) prepared to fork guichan >>>> so we don't have to strugle with vendors who can distribute UH. >>> >>> >>> >>> As long as the patch does not change the API (extending it is ok), >>> then that should not be a problem. >> >> >> >> http://gitorious.org/guichan/mainline/commit/90c8966f6cb153d6ab03e146d3ade33a03b94bdc >> >> The patch was commited upstream, it's a simple 1 liner, but no release >> was issued after it... So when a release happens we can drop it; >> Now... I don't see why we can't add this patch. > > > Good News, we (Fedora) are have that patch in our packages :) > > Regards, > > Hans -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of bread in the middle... _______________________________________________ games mailing list games@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/games
