Re: wesnoth 1.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>>> "JC" == Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> JC> Even to preserve other existing functionality, i.e. network play?
>
> Yes, because that functionality doesn't break due to the fact that an
> update was pushed.  I feel that taking an affirmative action to break
> things is worse than taking no action and having other things broken.
>
> If you like, push an update that, when started, opens a dialog
> explaining the situation.  It is also theoretically possible to push a
> wesnoth14 package which users could install after removing the
> existing package, but that gets a bit complicated and isn't really
> pleasant.

So it'd be preferable to leave it in rawhide, add something to the release
notes for F9, and call it done?

>  - J<
>


-- 
novus ordo absurdum

_______________________________________________
Fedora-games-list mailing list
Fedora-games-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Extras]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Directory]     [PAM]     [CentOS]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux