On 9/20/07, Nicu Buculei <nicu_fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Christopher Stone wrote: > >> Why not concentrate of which games to include, package or review or > >> atleast test my spin and provide me some feedback instead of spending > >> time which you claimed you didn't have to read my other mails on > >> seemingly redundant work. > > > > I'm curious to know how much extra space it actually takes. I would > > also be interested in space requirements for using xfce or even just > > twm. > > While I don't think including two big desktop environments (GNOME and > KDE) is a good idea (better include more games instead), using xfce has > some merits, not because of disk space but because of less CPU and RAM > consumption, leaving more free for games (IMO using twm as default is > not good, is not user-friendly enough). For the record, I too would be in favor of using xfce especially if it saves space. There is also the fact that no other spin has xfce as a default, so this too I think would be cool. +1 _______________________________________________ Fedora-games-list mailing list Fedora-games-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list
