On Thursday 06 July 2006 16:40, Hans de Goede wrote: > Michael Thomas wrote: > > Hugo Cisneiros wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Since we are (IMO) a integrated group, I had an idea to better > >> communicate our packaging proccess. What if we add the > >> fedora-games-list@xxxxxxxxxx to the CC on our bugzilla review requests > >> and the owners.list (as co-maintainer)? > >> > >> With this we can "ask automatically" if someone here can review the > >> package, or help. > >> > >> I think perl extras sig works in this way too... But can this be the > >> focus on this list? (I think yes). Then, before doing, let's get some > >> opinions :-) > > > > +1 to adding f-g-l to the cc list on reviews. > > +1 too +1 here :-) > Question, thus this complete or replace the tracker on the SIGs wiki, I > vote for complete. Since I tend to delete mail and if I feel like doing > a review the tracker on the wiki is a good place to start I think it completes as well. The mail is only a good notification system that you can always ignore if you want ;) The wiki can be a complete and always present list. The question is, can bugzilla send emails to here? bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx is allowed to post here? > > -1 to adding f-g-l to the cc field for owners.list, at least until we > > see how much traffic the bugzilla mail generates. > > -1 too, although I might be interested in some game packages bugs (like > libs packages of mine use) I'm not interested in all game packages bugs > and I get way too much mail as is already. I agree with these opinions. -- []'s Eitch http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/ "Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ @xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list
