Hans de Goede wrote: > > Michael Thomas wrote: > >>Hugo Cisneiros wrote: >> >>>Hi all, >>> >>>Since we are (IMO) a integrated group, I had an idea to better communicate our >>>packaging proccess. What if we add the fedora-games-list@xxxxxxxxxx to the CC >>>on our bugzilla review requests and the owners.list (as co-maintainer)? >>> >>>With this we can "ask automatically" if someone here can review the package, >>>or help. >>> >>>I think perl extras sig works in this way too... But can this be the focus on >>>this list? (I think yes). Then, before doing, let's get some opinions :-) >> >>+1 to adding f-g-l to the cc list on reviews. >> > > +1 too > > Question, thus this complete or replace the tracker on the SIGs wiki, I > vote for complete. Since I tend to delete mail and if I feel like doing > a review the tracker on the wiki is a good place to start I also think it should complete it, not replace it. The wiki is the only place to get the complete list of games needing or under review. --Mike
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ @xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list
