On Saturday 10 March 2007, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I've once again found some BuildRequires which ended up in a package > description (already filed in Bugzilla). This is not the first time this > happens. If the BuildRequires is listed after the description, RPM > considers it part of the description. This is bad because this means the > BuildRequires is ignored, which gets unnoticed if the package still builds > (with reduced functionality) without it. Good idea, the next version of rpmlint will check this. http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/changeset/1330 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
