Re: Data Packages Guideline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:04:05PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "AT" == Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> AT> If the existing guidelines cover this (which they do), then why
> AT> add it?
> 
> Because it needs to be written down somewhere.
> 
> AT> Anything for the packaging guidelines needs to be voted upon.
> 
> No disagreement, but this isn't a modification to the packaging
> guidelines.

It was suggested as one.

> Are you sure you understand what's being discussed here?  How would
> anyone know about the procedure for doing this if it weren't in the
> wiki somewhere?

I understand, I'm not that dense. ;)

Did you read the following parts in my mail?

> the addition is perhaps better made in the review guidelines.
> [...] But, as said, this probably just needs to be a clarification
> elsewhere.

I suggested twice to put it in the wiki, just not in the packaging
guidelines.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgp7mzELRc7QU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux