Re: Good Review Examples?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:13:01PM +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> 
> Are you interested in counter-examples too? It's not a formal review,
> but IMHO definitely highlights some of the possible misunderstandings
> people can have from the guidelines :
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230096
> 
> - No constructive comments, just "MUST" (some wrong) and "SHOULD"
> - No indication of it's formal or just some preliminary comments

I don't think this is a good example. I can guess that Xavier isn't very
experienced, so doing review that may be ameliorated is something
normal, and I think that one of the role, of (very) experienced
packagers is to point out out in a pedagogical manner his errors.
I don't disagree that there are mistakes in the review, but in my
opinion learning by doing (mistakes) should be encouraged, so I think
that in some sense this review is perfectly right since it shows an 
inexperienced reviewer who does his best to comment on a review.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux