http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors
Under the "Read Other Submissions" section, I think we should have a few
links to exemplary examples of how a package review should look like.
What are the elements of a good review example?
* Well formed submission as suggested by the template.
* Constructive comments describing how the package can be improved.
* Possibly some back and forth.
* APPROVED
* Properly formed fedora-cvs request
* done
Any good examples from recent review tickets?
Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
