On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:59:26PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > "mktemp" in the spec file BuildRoot tag is getting far too annoying, > especially since I do not like anything in my spec file which is not used > during my local test-builds, and because failure conditions are not dealt > with. I don't know yet what's necessary to block it from becoming > mandatory, but it's ridiculous, giving the fact that it will return a > fresh tmp dir with every invocation of rpmbuild. Check Ville's posting on fedora-packaging on correcting this. And FWIW I personally think this is the lesser evil. The real "solution" would be to leave buildroots w/o any mandatory clause. If a packager isn't able to construct a sane buildroot, then I don't need to check on the rest of the specfile ... -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpbm0ClzVqXo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
