Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thursday, 25 January 2007 at 19:20, Tim Jackson wrote: > > I have created the following suggested sample text to save people some > > time when asking upstream authors to include full license text in their > > packages: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/LicenseInclusionUpstreamRequest > > > > Any comments/changes welcome. I'm not trying to mandate that anyone > > should use this, just suggest that having a prewritten polite bit of > > boilerplate might save some time. > > > > If people like it generally then perhaps spot would consider including a > > link to it on the PackageReviewGuidelines under the relevant point about > > requesting upstream to include license text? > > Looks good to me. Some nits: > > s/This package/This software/ Nope. "Software" is a generic term, like "people". [Yes, a favorite nit of mine.] -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
