On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 11:56 -0500, Josef Whiter wrote: > > Geany has this approach because they do not want to have a dependency on > libvte, since geany will work perfectly fine without libvte. This patch > is what was committed upstream, so I'm simply matching them so geany > will load vte properly. When the next version comes out it will look > exactly like this (unless of course they change something). If you only > have vte installed, you will end up opening libvte.so.9, if you have > vte-devel it will load libvte.so, which will still work fine. Which is > more important, matching what upstream has, or changing the order so we > prefer libvte.so.9? Thank you, The important thing is that upstream learns how to do things the right way. That will help everybody in the long run. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
