On 1/24/07, Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 23:45 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > Fedora Core is actually done. Has been done for a while. :) Which brings me to the question of what we should do with complicated cases of mixed licensing. For example, Pango's License field says "LGPL", while it also contains parts that are not LGPL-ed, but dual licensed under GPL and FreeType Project License (which is not a subset of LGPL). I guess that would make Pango a dual licensed library, one license would be the GPL, and the other would be LGPL for some parts and FTL for some others. (It's currently marked LGPL only.) How are we supposed to document such things in the License field?
I had this discussion on IRC a few days ago and the conclusion was you either label it as GPL, or split the package up into a sub package that has the LGPL parts. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
