On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 12:27 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > The "License" field is insufficient. It is suitable for summing up the > relevant licence acronyms, but it cannot serve as a substitute for the > licence terms. > > If files included within a project are GPL'ed and other files are licensed > under a different licence, the combined work must be GPL'ed, too. It > cannot be LGPL'ed, because the LGPL is _less_ restrictive compared with > the GPL. For LGPL, all files must be LGPL'ed. OK, I just opened a bug for Pango and CC-ed you and spot: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224135 Roozbeh -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
