Re: FE Package Status of Jan 11, 2007

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:25:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Can you give examples?

Huh, sure here is one example (but I get the impression we are not
talking about the same thing for some reason...)

In http://fedoraproject.org/extras/development/i386/
you will find:
alsa-tools-1.0.12-4.fc7.i386.rpm
while in http://fedoraproject.org/extras/development/ppc/
you will not find an alsa-tools binary package

So the count of binary packages in i386 is bound to be different than
the count of binary packages in ppc.

> It sounds a bit like ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch abuse.

Why ?

					C

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux