On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:29:23 +0100, Christian Iseli wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:26:42 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Thank you for the report. Would it be useful to list both source and > > binary package numbers here? > > Could do. They vary a bit among the architectures, though, so I guess > we should have one count for each... They should be the same, because the buildsys always builds a src.rpm for all architectures. The single exception is FE3, where half a dozen packages have a higher VR for x86_64 compared with i386. That's due to the old manual builds. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
