Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 15:18 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently working on getting gstreamer-plugins-bad into that other
repo, and I was thinking that it could actually be a good idea to put it
in FE and only put the parts with troublesome dependencies in FE.
Hi,
as an upstream GStreamer maintainer and a fellow Fedora Extras
contributor, I respectfully respect that no package for
gstreamer-plugins-bad gets put in Fedora Extras.
I understand, and will honor your request. Thanks for asking this
politely. What about putting them in that other repo, I guess you feel
mostly the same about that?
I really want to see gstreamer-plugins-bad in that other repo as it adds
QT support (which cannot be in FE in anyway because of patent issues).
Since afaik a lot of work has been done on QT support lately, maybe an
other option would be to move QT support from bad to ugly, or to patch
the repo-that-must-not-be-named ugly version to add QT support?
Or what about a bad plugins package for that other repo with only the QT
plugin in there?
I'm looking forward to hear from you.
Thanks for the input & Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
