Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"HdG" == Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> writes:
HdG> I maintain close to 100 packages, I'm sure quite a few of them
HdG> stem from fedora.us and the last thing I want is maintainance
HdG> work without any real gains.
Having clean packages which follow the packaging guidelines is a real
gain.
True, but they are already clean and follow the guidelines, this
exercise can lead to much hairsplitting leading to unneeded updates and
thus unneeded work. First lets create a set of rules for re-review and
then discuss this further. For example what if a spelling error is found
in a %description, does that warrant a new release (even if only for
development)? What if its a 100Mb package, does it then still warrant a
new release etc?
Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
