Re: Package review status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "HdG" == Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> writes:

[Reviewing all packages imported from fedora.us]
HdG> -1, if not -10, why?

Many of them were not properly reviewed, or have no existing record of
review.  Not to mention that some guidelines are significantly
different now.

HdG> I maintain close to 100 packages, I'm sure quite a few of them
HdG> stem from fedora.us and the last thing I want is maintainance
HdG> work without any real gains.

Having clean packages which follow the packaging guidelines is a real
gain.

 - J<

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux