Jeffrey C. Ollie schrieb: > On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 06:40 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Jeffrey C. Ollie schrieb: >>> Maybe there was an agreement on non-error messages, but error messages >>> should be allowed in certain circumstances. >> Well, allowed maybe, but it IMHO does not make to much sense for the >> same reasons so you should not rely on them. > True, but to just silently ignore errors just seems wrong to me. Yeap. > If all > output to stdout/stderr is to be banned then there should be some > standard mechanism for reporting the errors so that the user can be > informed & deal with the situation. Of course, this all takes time... Something for the next-gen rpm? Or should we try to build something around the current rpm? CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
