On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 06:40 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Jeffrey C. Ollie schrieb: > > > > Maybe there was an agreement on non-error messages, but error messages > > should be allowed in certain circumstances. > > Well, allowed maybe, but it IMHO does not make to much sense for the > same reasons so you should not rely on them. True, but to just silently ignore errors just seems wrong to me. If all output to stdout/stderr is to be banned then there should be some standard mechanism for reporting the errors so that the user can be informed & deal with the situation. Of course, this all takes time... Jeff
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
