Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 19:09 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:12:51PM -0600, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
http://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/bcfg2/browser/trunk/bcfg2/LICENSE
Free enough for extras?
No, because of the advertisement clause:
"4. All advertising materials, journal articles and documentation
mentioning features derived from or use of the Software must display
the following acknowledgment:"
This is a restriction on use which renders it non free. Also it may be
hard to follow this rule since it is not very precise, since 'mentionning
features derived from or use' maybe understood more or less broadly.
Dont we allow the 4-clause BSD license in Fedora?
Annoyingly, yes. It's on the list of GPL-Incompatible, Free Software
Licenses.
The above advertising clause isnt much different. Is it?
Rahul
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
