On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 19:09 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:12:51PM -0600, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote: > >> http://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/bcfg2/browser/trunk/bcfg2/LICENSE > >> > >> Free enough for extras? > > > > No, because of the advertisement clause: > > > > "4. All advertising materials, journal articles and documentation > > mentioning features derived from or use of the Software must display > > the following acknowledgment:" > > > > This is a restriction on use which renders it non free. Also it may be > > hard to follow this rule since it is not very precise, since 'mentionning > > features derived from or use' maybe understood more or less broadly. > > Dont we allow the 4-clause BSD license in Fedora? Annoyingly, yes. It's on the list of GPL-Incompatible, Free Software Licenses. josh -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
