Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>>>> "RD" == Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> writes: > > RD> NOPE, not OSI: "All other uses not mentioned here require a > RD> commercial license." > > The problem is that there's another clause which says "If you're open > source, you are exempted". IMO (of course), still doesn't matter. OSI requires full redistributability and no restrictions on usage, period. This license would prevent usage in the case of a respun distro (based on Fedora) that included non-OSS bits for commericial purposes/use, which otherwise would(should!) be perfectly acceptable. -- Rex -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
