On 12/10/2006 04:46 AM, Peter Gordon wrote:
On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 03:40 +0200, lonely wolf wrote:
Now you have an extra %changelog section in your spec. Though I don't
know for certain if that causes problems (or what problems it may cause
if it does), I'd recommend reconciling that so as to have only one
%changelog section. :)
Nice catch. Shouldn't rpmlint (version 0.77) find that ? 'cause I did
test both src.rpm and binary rpm :(
Doesn't seem like it does. Should we file a bug about that perhaps?
Since neither rpmlint 0.78 catches this, I have filed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219068
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
