On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 03:40 +0200, lonely wolf wrote: > > Now you have an extra %changelog section in your spec. Though I don't > > know for certain if that causes problems (or what problems it may cause > > if it does), I'd recommend reconciling that so as to have only one > > %changelog section. :) > > > Nice catch. Shouldn't rpmlint (version 0.77) find that ? 'cause I did > test both src.rpm and binary rpm :( Doesn't seem like it does. Should we file a bug about that perhaps? -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
