Re: On Debian and Fedora experiences

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Panu Matilainen scripst:
> Now, I do think soft dependencies *would* be a powerful feature,
> correctly and sparingly used and actually implemented in the tools. How
> I personally think it should be done, is two levels of soft dependencies
> (btw this is how Suse's rpm fork implements it, JBJ's rpm only has one
> level): there are strong and weak dependency hints.

IIRC, that's exactly what Debian has -- Recommends (according to the above
mentioned page) "declares a strong, but not absolute, dependency", whereas
Suggests

	This is used to declare that one package may be more useful with
	one or more others. Using this field tells the packaging system
	and the user that the listed packages are related to this one and
	can perhaps enhance its usefulness, but that installing this one
	without them is perfectly reasonable.

Matěj

-- 
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/, Jabber: ceplma<at>jabber.cz
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB  25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
 
They never open their mouths without subtracting from the sum of
human knowledge.
      -- Thomas Brackett Reed

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux