On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 13:36 +0100, Denis Leroy wrote: > Dan Williams wrote: > > Darn, sorry. That's my fault, I half-thought I still owned the package > > since I used to de-facto own it and I'm upstream for it... Sorry, won't > > happen again. :( > > > > In spite of that faux pas on my part, there were a few things with it > > that I noticed. First, when we backed down to NM 0.6.4 for FC-6 this > > summer, I probably should have backed down the NM-vpnc package to 0.6.4 > > as well, adding the epoch. We're already shipping a CVS version and its > > just coincidental that it works with NM 0.6.4. Future versions likely > > will not. Second, do you happen to recall where the bug with the group > > password patch was filed? I can pull it upstream but having looked > > through gnome and RH bugzilla quickly I can't find it. > > Hey no problem. The 0.6.4 versus 0.7.0-cvs-based version discrepancy was > actually not a problem, I had carefully reviewed and tested the CVS > changes: only extra translations, no actual code changes involved. There are patches floating around for the dict-based VPN API, which won't be backported to 0.6.4. That patch will probably land soon, so we should either revert to the 0.6.x VPN plugin and bump the epoch, or updates to the plugin from HEAD will be incompatible with 0.6.x thats in FC6. > For the group passwd patch: > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363918 Aha, thanks! Dan \ -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
