Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-12-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dan Williams wrote:
Darn, sorry.  That's my fault, I half-thought I still owned the package
since I used to de-facto own it and I'm upstream for it... Sorry, won't
happen again.  :(

In spite of that faux pas on my part, there were a few things with it
that I noticed.  First, when we backed down to NM 0.6.4 for FC-6 this
summer, I probably should have backed down the NM-vpnc package to 0.6.4
as well, adding the epoch.  We're already shipping a CVS version and its
just coincidental that it works with NM 0.6.4.  Future versions likely
will not.  Second, do you happen to recall where the bug with the group
password patch was filed?  I can pull it upstream but having looked
through gnome and RH bugzilla quickly I can't find it.

Hey no problem. The 0.6.4 versus 0.7.0-cvs-based version discrepancy was actually not a problem, I had carefully reviewed and tested the CVS changes: only extra translations, no actual code changes involved.

For the group passwd patch:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363918

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux