Re: rpms/xl2tpd/devel xl2tpd.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 06:00:40 +0100 (CET)
paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Paul Wouters) wrote:

On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:

Author: pwouters
Added Files:
 xl2tpd.spec
Humm... perhaps I am not doing too well with my bugzilla handling
tonight, but I don't see off hand a review of this package or a
approval of said review.
What was the bug number of the review?
kevin
I cannot see the corresponding review request from the bugzilla
entry related to Paul Wouters (total 13).

Unfortunately he has already rebuilt this against FE-devel,
this package should be removed from FE-devel releasing queue.
See:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-November/msg00542.html

Since no one replied in over a week, I asked Tom Callaway, my sponsor,
how to proceed. He told me to go ahead with the migration.

So today I added xl2tpd, and will request branches for FC-6 and FC-5.
Once those are build, I will mark l2tpd as a dead package.

Ah... I must have missed that post on the list... You might want to look at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-581c3fb3ff1c6ef7404e8b288b59cd5280d75ad6

You only have "Obsoletes: l2tpd", which is a bad idea IMHO. You should
add a Provides for just over the current l2tpd version and only
Obsoletes the very last l2tpd version released. Something like:
Provides: l2tpd = 0.69-0.6.20051030.fc7
Obsoletes: l2tpd <= 0.69-0.6.20051030.fc6

This way if ever someone wants to revive it or some other package with
that name comes along it would be easy to get it back in (just have the
new package provide a newer version of l2tpd).
kevin

Well, I tried to rebuild this package, and I get the following
rpmlint complaint.
--------------------------------------------------------
E: xl2tpd tag-not-utf8 %changelog
E: xl2tpd obsolete-not-provided l2tpd
E: xl2tpd non-readable /etc/xl2tpd/l2tp-secrets 0600
E: xl2tpd non-readable /etc/ppp/chap-secrets.sample 0600
W: xl2tpd dangerous-command-in-%post mv
E: xl2tpd no-chkconfig-line /etc/rc.d/init.d/xl2tpd
E: xl2tpd tag-not-utf8 %changelog
E: xl2tpd non-utf8-spec-file xl2tpd.spec
W: xl2tpd unversioned-explicit-obsoletes l2tpd
W: xl2tpd mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 65, tab: line 52)
E: xl2tpd-debuginfo tag-not-utf8 %changelog
---------------------------------------------------------
I have not yet checked this, however, I think that this package
should once pass current FE review request check.

Mamoru Tasaka

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux