On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 13:45 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thursday 30 November 2006 12:29, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > I would say that apt and smart's UI would not suffer from a > > migration to comps provided that comps lists all the packages in the > > repository. > > Why do all packages have to be listed in comps? The grouping metadata can > list packages being in some groups, and then if a package isn't in any group, > the tool (apt/smart) could represent that as 'Ungrouped' or however you want > to phrase it. > http://fedoraproject.org/extras/6/x86_64/repodata/repoview/__nogroup__.group.html I'm writing an email application and want to find a library to help me do signing and encryption. Do you know if Fedora includes one? I'm looking for something that I can use to make rpms in a clean chroot. Is there a package for something like that in Fedora? I'm working on some surveying software and I need to do a lot of work with maps, coordinate plotting, etc. What libraries are available in Fedora to help me get my work done? There is software to answer all these questions in Fedora but it's not listed in comps. Just look at the repoview page and you'll see why Ungrouped leads to a horrible end-user experience. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
