Re: New Comps Groups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 22:49 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> I don't see anything stopping that from happening now.
> 
> Either:
>  1. write the above interface for repodata and then have yum be able to
> understand that info
>  2. use the existing comps format and just have yum be able to look up
> pkgs by the group they belong to. So for the above you would do:
>    Take the intersection of /Language/Python, /Development/Library,
> and /Security/Cryptography and display those pkgs.
> Then comps looks like:
> 
>   <group>
>    <name>/Security/Cryptography</name>
>    <package>python-gpgme</package>
>    <package>gpgme</package>
>    <package>gnupg</package>
>   </group>
>   <group>
>    <name>/Development/Library</name>
>    <package>python-gpgme</package>
>    <package>gpgme</package>
>   </group>
> 
So perhaps all we need is free reign to do this in comps.  Which, from
previous messages from jeremy, seems to imply we would need to have
separate comps.xml files for the installer and for the repo.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux