2006/11/27, Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx>:
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx) said: >> qt >> Quicktime container format support, through own gst code (no libs used), >> this one is trouble some. I would really like to see this in FE as this >> adds supports for videos made with many digital photo cameras to >> gstreamer using applications (usually these camera's just dump a raw >> audio stream and a serie of jpeg images into a .mov file. >> >> So where should this one go? I really don't know. Can anyone help here? > > I'm not 100% sure, but I believe the quicktime *container* format is open; > it's just that most of the things put in it usually aren't. > So that makes 2 votes in favor of qt container support in FE, rest assured I'm only talking about *container* support here. Are there any nay-sayers? Should we pass this through legal first? (no please). Anyone who can give a definite YES?
I'm not too familiar with the QT container format, but here's an Apple developer talking about parts of QuickTime that is patented: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2001-October/004846.html Whether the patent is still valid, or whether it's implemented in gstreamer-plugins-bad, I don't know. -- Michel Salim http://hircus.wordpress.com/ My theology, briefly, is that the universe was dictated but not signed. -- Christopher Morley -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
